« The State of Education In America | Main | Women and the Olympics »

July 17, 2012

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00e554f4b21588340167689460e9970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Another graphic that has some likely errors . . .:

Comments

Timothy B.

This argument is illogical because companies who discriminate based on gender face the same detriment as those who discriminate based on traits other than ability: they weaken their human capital by purposefully excluding those with the skills to bring value to their operations. Even if there is collusion/tradition/what have you that prevents a company from hiring from this populace, eventually an organization will rise to capitalize on this underutilized population and thrive.

This is an interesting field of research. Coming from a profession that pays men and women equally, and in which more women serve as coordinators and managers/directors than men, I would be interested to see a more detailed analysis. For instance, in many healthcare fields there are ranges in 'full-time' employment as disparate as 24 to 40 hours per week. Are these weekly numbers adjusted to a per hour basis? Or another example: are attorneys' hours adjusted based on billable status?

It's hard to deny an income gap exists, but how much of that is due to a true difference in pay rates versus fewer wage hours? Or other circumstances that these numbers obscure?

The comments to this entry are closed.